Question
How to find the equation, intercepts, and intersection points of two rational graphs
Original question: Question 12 Let and , where and are constants. The graph of is shown below.
(a) Sketch the graph of on the axes above. (3 marks)
(b) Determine the values of and . (2 marks)
(c) Solve the equation , giving your solution(s) to one decimal place. (2 marks)
See next page
Expert Verified Solution
Key concept: When two rational functions are involved, the cleanest move is to read the asymptotes first, then match any shifted form to the graph. After that, the intersection equation usually becomes much simpler than it looks at first glance.
Step by step
Step 1: Read the structure of each function
We have
and
For a rational function of the form :
- the vertical asymptote is
- the horizontal asymptote is
So for :
- vertical asymptote:
- horizontal asymptote:
Its graph is a rectangular hyperbola shifted right by 3, and because of the minus sign it sits in the opposite orientation from .
Step 2: Sketch
Key features to plot:
- asymptote
- asymptote
- one point to the left, one to the right
Try a couple of values:
So the graph passes through and .
That is enough to sketch the curve accurately around the asymptotes.
Step 3: Determine and
Match the asymptotes of to the graph shown.
- vertical asymptote comes from , so
- horizontal asymptote is
From the graph of , read those asymptotes directly:
- if the vertical asymptote is , then , so
- if the horizontal asymptote is , then
So the values are:
Step 4: Solve
Substitute the values into :
So solve
Since
we can rewrite
Then the equation becomes
Multiply both sides by :
That is impossible.
So there are no solutions.
Final answers
- (a) Sketch with asymptotes and .
- (b) ,
- (c) No solution
Pitfall alert
A common slip is to confuse the vertical asymptote of with . It is actually . Another easy mistake is to forget that can be rewritten as , and that sign changes the whole orientation of the sketch.
Try different conditions
If the graph of were shifted up or down, only would change; the vertical asymptote would still give . If the coefficient in front of the fraction were changed, the asymptotes would stay the same, but the branches would get stretched or flipped. The intersection step would still begin by rewriting both equations into the same denominator form.
Further reading
vertical asymptote, horizontal asymptote, rational function
FAQ
How do I find p and q from a graph of g(x)=1/(x+p)+q?
Read the vertical asymptote as x=-p and the horizontal asymptote as y=q, then match them to the graph.
Why can f(x)=4/(3-x) be rewritten as -4/(x-3)?
Because 3-x=-(x-3), so the minus sign can be moved outside the fraction. This makes the asymptotes and sketch easier to identify.